Zizobet
-
-
-
-
- Neosurf
- MiFinity
- CashtoCode
-
-
-
-
- Wager
- 30–45x
- Payout
- 24h
- Min dep
- £10
- Licence
- Curaçao
Are you 18 or over?
Regulon contains information about real-money gambling. You must be 18 or over to continue.
“Malta online casinos” commonly refers to casinos offering services licensed by the Malta Gaming Authority (MGA). This guide identifies four MGA-licensed services, compares three operators’ published payment policies, and explains the player protections and complaint routes behind the licence.
Advertising disclosure: we may earn commission from links below. How this works
Availability depends on your country and the operator serving your account. A company based in Malta is not necessarily an MGA-licensed casino, and an MGA licence does not mean a site accepts residents of Malta or every other country.
The table identifies four brands and their MGA-licensed operators. Use the MGA Licensee Register and URL Checker to examine the current record. These are licensing examples, not ranked recommendations.
| Brand and domain | MGA-licensed operator | Licence reference |
|---|---|---|
| LeoVegas (leovegas.com) | LeoVegas Gaming plc | MGA/CRP/237/2013 |
| Mr Green (mrgreen.com) | Mr Green Limited | MGA/CRP/121/2006 |
| Videoslots (videoslots.com) | Videoslots Limited | MGA/CRP/258/2014 |
| PlayOJO (playojo.com) | Skill On Net Limited | MGA/CRP/171/2009 |
Research note: Licence records were reviewed on 1–2 October 2026; Mr Green’s record was checked on 1 October. The payment comparison below describes published operator documents reviewed on 2 October. Deposits, withdrawals and support were not tested. PlayOJO is included only as a licensing example.
Read the market and document scope together with each figure. This comparison concerns euro-denominated MGA services; it does not establish country eligibility. Processing means the operator’s handling of a request, with payment-provider arrival considered separately below.
| Comparison field | LeoVegas | Mr Green | Videoslots |
|---|---|---|---|
| Service / currency | International MGA service; EUR examples. | Mr Green Limited’s MGA service; EUR account examples. | MGA service; EUR payment rules. |
| Withdrawal minimum | €10 in international English help; smaller requests through support. | €30 in terms, subject to method; smaller amounts through support. | €20 in reviewed MGA terms; smaller amounts through support. |
| Published fees | Terms reserve charges for unwagered funds; bank/provider charges may apply. | €1 up to €100. Above €100: terms say 1.5%, help says 1%; both cap at €10. | Normal bank wire: no operator fee. Below-minimum requests: 3.95%. Other withdrawal charges may apply. |
| Published processing policy | Reviewed terms aim for 24 hours after applicable identification documents. | No fixed approval deadline stated; timing depends on verification, amount and method. | Reviewed terms aim for 48 hours after satisfactory due-diligence documents. |
| Document scope | International terms version 2.7, February 2026, plus international English minimum-withdrawal help. | Terms updated 5 August 2026, plus withdrawal-help pages. | MGA-specific terms, payment section; revision date unconfirmed. |
| Important limitation | Latest applicable terms not confirmed; the 24-hour figure is a documented aim, not a verified current service promise. | Percentage-fee conflict remains unresolved. | Latest applicable terms not confirmed; the figures describe the reviewed document. |
Source note: LeoVegas and Videoslots figures are attributed to the specified documents, not presented as confirmed current account terms. General MGA links support the regulatory explanations; they do not verify operator fees or payout targets. Detailed operator evidence is retained separately.
The reviewed international terms provide a processing aim, while the help page explains how to request a small-balance withdrawal. These answer different questions. A low selectable minimum is useful only if the method, charges and verification requirements also suit the account.
The published material does not support an unconditional “free withdrawals” recommendation. The terms reserve charges in specified circumstances, including unwagered funds, while help material gives a broader fee-free description. Obtain a written explanation of the applicable charge before relying on that description. Do not wager simply to avoid a possible fee.
Mr Green provides a concrete minimum and a route for returning a smaller balance. Its unresolved fee discrepancy matters most above €100. For a hypothetical €200 withdrawal, the published percentages imply €3 or €2 before separate provider charges.
That is a cost difference, not evidence of different payout speed. The published approval process depends on account verification, withdrawal amount and method; it does not provide a fixed approval deadline suitable for a speed ranking.
The reviewed MGA terms distinguish ordinary bank-wire withdrawals from requests below the normal minimum. The support-assisted route can return a small balance, but its stated percentage charge means it is not equivalent to the normal fee-free bank-wire route.
The 48-hour aim begins after satisfactory due-diligence documents. It therefore describes handling after those requirements are met. Because the current revision was not confirmed, use this example to identify the minimum, exception and charging rules that need to be established for an actual account.
PlayOJO has no payment profile here: its licence association is documented, but the evidence did not establish an applicable set of current MGA payment conditions. Its inclusion makes no claim about comparative cost or speed.
A brand is the trading name you recognise; the operator is the company responsible for your account; the Malta Gaming Authority regulates the licensed service. Its licence identifies the company and authorised activities.
A single brand can serve different markets through different legal entities and regulators. That is why the footer and country-specific terms matter more than a familiar logo. For Great Britain, an operator needs the appropriate UK Gambling Commission licence to offer online casino gambling to consumers there; an MGA licence alone is insufficient.
A business-to-consumer (B2C) licence concerns the operator serving players. Business-to-business (B2B) authorisation concerns critical gaming supplies. An MGA-licensed supplier in the lobby does not establish the authorisation of the casino taking your deposits.
For more detail on the licensing framework, see our Malta gaming licence guide.
Start with your likely deposit and withdrawal amounts. The useful questions are whether your payment method supports withdrawals, what taking out your balance costs, and whether the account’s limits suit your budget. Then assess bonus restrictions and game selection.
Useful Malta casino reviews identify the operator, market and testing performed. Published policies support comparisons of contractual conditions; a claim about actual service quality needs evidence from transactions or documented support interactions.
Open the general MGA register independently and compare its record with the casino’s disclosures:
Match the company, domain and applicable service together. A familiar brand can appear on country-specific sites operated by different companies; one company’s licence does not establish the others’ authorisation.
Save the matching operator details with your account records. If the information differs, pause registration and ask for an explanation supported by the official record.
Compare a welcome offer’s required wagering, deadline, game restrictions and stake limits. Its headline percentage cannot explain the conditions attached to the bonus.
Consider two hypothetical offers with a €50 deposit and a €50 bonus:
These totals describe qualifying stakes, not required losses or predicted returns. Repeated betting can exhaust the balance before you complete the requirement.
Game contribution changes the calculation. If a permitted game contributes 10%, a €10 bet adds only €1 towards the wagering target. A game excluded from the promotion may contribute nothing or breach its rules, depending on the terms.
Read the expiry period, maximum permitted bet, excluded payment methods and any limit on convertible winnings. Find out whether withdrawing your deposit cancels the bonus and what happens to winnings associated with it. Save the promotion’s terms when accepting it so you can identify the conditions that applied.
If you prefer to play without a bonus, find the opt-in or decline option before depositing. The ordinary account and payment terms still apply. Do not increase your planned spending simply to complete a promotion.
For slots, return to player (RTP) describes the theoretical proportion of stakes returned over a very large number of plays. A 96% RTP does not mean a €100 session will return €96. The corresponding theoretical house edge is 4%; neither figure predicts your result, which can include losing the entire stake.
Volatility describes how uneven the results tend to be. A high-volatility game can produce larger swings, but a losing run does not make a win due. Read the information for the game version offered, since RTP configurations can differ.
For table and live dealer games, compare minimum stakes and payout rules. Keep availability separate from promotional eligibility: a game can be offered in the lobby while excluded from a bonus.
Deposit and withdrawal methods can differ. Establish the withdrawal destination, account currency and ownership requirements before funding the account.
Separate operator fees, payment-provider charges and currency-conversion costs. An operator can charge nothing while the receiving bank applies a fee. Compare the total cost for your intended withdrawal, including any charge for returning a balance below the normal minimum.
Keep three measures separate. The regulatory rule concerns the operator’s obligation to remit funds. Its published target describes how quickly it aims to handle requests. Payment-provider arrival is the additional stage before the money becomes available in your bank or payment account. An operator’s target can start after verification; the regulatory rule has its own qualifications.
Article 29 of the MGA Player Protection Directive requires funds to be remitted within five working days of a request where practicable. It also permits time reasonably necessary for identity checks, security procedures, checking compliance with game rules and anti-money-laundering requirements. This is not an unconditional promise that your bank will receive the money within five working days.
If a request stalls, ask whether it is awaiting documents, an internal decision or payment-provider handling. Record the request date, the date documents were accepted and any payment reference. This separates a verification delay from a transfer that has already been sent.
Use a payment account in your own name and submit verification documents through the operator’s secure route. If checks remain outstanding, ask which document is needed and whether previous submissions were accepted.
The MGA explains how player funds are protected through segregation and separate identification. These arrangements concern the handling of balances, not the risk of losing money while gambling.
Mr Green’s reviewed terms explain that protection arrangements do not absolutely guarantee repayment in insolvency. A casino balance should not be treated as savings.
The MGA’s player-protection guidance requires operators to offer deposit or wagering limits. Players must have an opportunity to set them during registration or before the first deposit, and the controls must remain easily accessible. This does not mean every operator must offer every type of limit.
Deposit limits restrict money paid in; wagering limits restrict stakes. Repeatedly staking a €10 balance can generate more than €10 in wagers without another deposit.
A stricter limit takes effect immediately. A requested relaxation takes effect only after at least 24 hours. Where several limits apply, the strictest takes precedence: reaching a weekly limit should prevent further play or deposits covered by that limit even if a daily allowance remains.
Self-exclusion blocks gambling access and differs from ordinary account closure. Where brands require separate registration, an exclusion for reasons unrelated to problem gambling may be limited to the requested brand. Where there are sufficient indications of a gambling problem, exclusion must extend across the licensee’s brands.
That coverage does not automatically extend to unrelated MGA operators. Identify the company handling the request and ask which brands it covers. An exclusion should not prevent withdrawal of your existing balance; if account access is blocked, contact support for the withdrawal route.
For eligible UK residents, GAMSTOP’s online self-exclusion service covers gambling websites and apps run by businesses licensed in Great Britain. It is not a universal exclusion system for every MGA licensee. GamCare provides support for people affected by gambling, including through the National Gambling Helpline.
Start with the operator’s formal complaints process. State the issue and requested outcome, such as a fee explanation or a decision on a withheld withdrawal.
A useful complaint includes your account identifier, the amount involved, relevant dates, transaction or game references, and the supporting terms or correspondence. Keep a copy of the submission and any case number. Avoid sending passwords or unnecessary payment details.
Request a final written position identifying the term behind the operator’s decision. This gives an independent reviewer a clear record of the disagreement.
Find the designated alternative dispute resolution (ADR) entity in the operator’s complaints terms. Mr Green’s reviewed terms name eCOGRA; other services may designate a different provider.
There are two distinct escalation routes. After the internal complaints process is exhausted, an unresolved contractual dispute can be referred to that ADR entity. The MGA’s Player Support Unit considers regulatory complaints, such as allegations that a licensed service is unsafe, unfair or lacks transparency. The regulator does not replace the ADR entity’s assessment of the merits of an individual dispute.
Use the MGA complaint form for concerns within its remit. The form accepts English or Maltese, and the authority recommends contacting the operator first. Identify the correct legal company, rather than only the casino brand, so the complaint can be connected to the relevant licensed service.
Before depositing, establish the operator, withdrawal route, bonus conditions and spending controls. Keep the complaints details accessible, and limit gambling to money you can afford to lose.
An applicable MGA licence provides regulatory obligations and complaint routes. It does not remove gambling losses or operational risk. Assess the operator’s payment conditions and player protections alongside its authorisation.
No. Availability depends on local licensing requirements and operator restrictions. Inclusion in an MGA casino list does not establish eligibility to register.
Complain to the operator first. Its designated ADR provider handles unresolved contractual disputes; the MGA considers regulatory complaints. Keep the decision, relevant terms and transaction records for escalation.
There is no universal instant-withdrawal rule. A payment’s timing depends on the operator’s handling, any outstanding checks and the receiving payment provider.
No. Coverage concerns the operator and applicable brands, not all unrelated MGA licensees. Obtain confirmation from the company handling your request.